The November challenge for the origami-dan discord was "aerial/sky high" so although I haven't designed much in a while, I decided I had to make something before the month ended. I'm in college now at MIT (yay!) so between struggling over math homework and procrastinating with dark souls, I haven't had much time to fold anything.
I've always liked egrets (probably from back when I was a big fan of the great blue heron) and are probably what most people think of when they hear "crane," so I decided to make one.
The underlying structure is not too complex
I've always wanted to make one of these birds on a large scale, and I didn't feel like preparing lots of mulberry or double tissue, so I just used a 3x3 foot square of tracing paper.
Precreasing was a challenge since I haven't worked on this scale very much, and I use a much smaller table now and have much less space (the 3x3 foot square doesn't even fully fit on it).
Thankfully the collapse was very straightforward
Once I got to the base, I started folding the feathers.
I made one small mistake in the spacing of the legs relative to the body, so I ended up using glue to push the legs one unit forward (which also lost one unit of length on the legs). Fixing the rivers(? not sure if this is the correct terminology) is relatively straightforward though, so I'll leave it as an exercise to the reader. If you're interested in folding this design, as long as you're ok with using some glue to reposition the two leg flaps, this mistake won't bother you, and you can ignore this whole paragraph of commentary!
At any rate, I'm quite fond of the shaping on the legs. I think they came out quite well anyways.
One particular lesson I learned while making this is that you should always make sure the legs are a little further forward in the base than what you choose when drawing the tree, or else the tail plume risks looking too short. Also, always make the tail plume longer than anatomically true since for some reason this little bit of trickery makes things (oddly) appear more realistic (at least in my opinion).
Thanks for reading!








